Like the District Court below, the Sixth Circuit rejected the plaintiffs' arguments that the Court had jurisdiction because the plaintiffs are Kentucky residents. The Court wrote that tweets sent from outside of Kentucky are not "acts" within Kentucky, and that those tweets do not sufficiently connect their author to the jurisdiction of Kentucky to allow jurisdiction under the United States Constitution. The Court wrote that the tweets "formed no contacts" with Kentucky at all. All of the claims against Faruki's client remain dismissed.