Last year, the court granted, in part, plaintiffs' motion for class certification, and certified five national subclasses. Subsequently, the parties entered into settlement negotiations to resolve the dispute. The parties reached a settlement and submitted it to the court for approval. The National Federation of the Blind ("NFB") objected to the settlement and raised significant due process concerns. In response to the NFB's objections, the court twice denied approval of the parties' settlement agreement because the release, as drafted (and later revised), was over broad and prevented the visually impaired from bringing disability-related lawsuits against Disney.
A revised settlement agreement was finally reached and submitted for approval at the end of last year. On January 28, 2013, the court entered its final approval of the parties' settlement agreement. The court certified four national subclasses for settlement purposes only: (1) The Website Class; (2) The Effective Communication Class; (3) The Service Animal Class; and (4) The Infrastructure Class. Some of the more interesting relief provided under the terms of the settlement agreement include:
Under the terms of the agreement, Disney has one year to implement these changes, among others. While it is surprising that Disney parks do not yet provide master Braille maps, some of the other relief may ignite irritation with other Disney guests. For example, what accommodations must be made for those guests with animal-driven allergies who are waiting in line (unbeknownst to them) near a temporary kennel for service animals? What protections will be afforded to the service animals so that other guests do not taunt the animals while their owner is riding the attraction? These and other concerns will surely be addressed by Disney in the coming months, and it will be interesting to see how the company known for innovation and creativity implement this relief so that its visually impaired guests can get the full Disney experience.